Every couple of weeks I help teach my son’s kindergarten computer lesson at his school. This is of course a lot of fun, and at a level that usually matches my real functional computer capabilities. Of course even with a bunch of five year olds the analyst comes out in me.
I decided to subject a couple of his poor friends to some computer branding exercises. I through a few names to them in terms of technology companies. Microsoft and HP were well known, and Dell had some awareness, (their machines were whiteboxes, but have Dell or HP or others at home I guessed). IBM had no awareness, however, Skype had a couple of nods, as did e-Bay and Google, scarily perhaps so did Facebook. Perhaps not surprisingly, IBM had 1 response. For other services firms such as Accenture and EDS there was blank stares.
Was I surprised by this no, of course not. What it will mean is that the companies such as Microsoft, HP ect will have their potential customers grow up on their product and understand it. In 25 years time when my son’s classmates maybe in a position to buy IT, they are going to be more and more disposed to brands that they have grown up with. This generation will not know that IBM made the PC mainstream. There is every likelihood that as for Accenture and EDS, they will not learn about IBM as a company in a practical sense until they reach the workforce in 20 or so years.
This is a fundamental challenge in particular with the growth of Google, e-Bay etc as brands. How IBM, Accenture etc handle it may very well define how they maintain a future as an organisation in the future. The need for these firms to continually reinvent themselves is becoming clearer, and the reinvention cycles for every brand in IT, consumer or enterprise is becoming shorter.
Be the first to rate this post
- Currently 0/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5